Sept 30 Bidleborough Beatrice? See D 30 Jermey. Green Gordon J? See Mch 34 Musgrave Stubbs? Mch 35 Nolan Aston Frances? Mch 35 Pinnington Olive E? See M'35 Robinson Pixton J? Dec'35 Priaulx Chapman Onida? Dec 35 68 Pratt Cross Benjamin? Dop Laurie T? See D 35 Thomas Dubbin Victoria? See D. See D35 Jermy. Aitchinson Rita V W? Jan'36 Smith Key Jay? June 36 Frangniola Gianetta Caroline L? Sep 36 Jones Sellesley Raymonde? Sept 36 Brennan Young John J?
See S36 Rushton. Dec 36 Hobbs Annetts Valerie S? Armstrong Phillip? Mch 37 Murphy Henry? Mch'37 Harrison Stock Jack? Mch'37 Wright Sheila 7a see M37 Irving. See J. June'37 20 Tunstall Rees Alice F? See J37 Adair Tomlinson Vincent? June'37 65 Bradshaw Whiteley Joan? Dec '37 Tilford Distleman Shirley Y? Dec 37 Vansittart. Mch 38 Bullen Ernest F A? See J38 Brooks Edward W? See J'38 Cane Wharton Nesta? Sept '38 Bayler Pharoh Nancy? Dec 38 Holliday Blundell Cecilia P? Dec 38 Robinson Geary Margaret? Dec'38 James Kengan Patricia?
Dec'38 Darley Kengom Patricia? D'38 Taylor Major Amy E? Dec'38 Bowman Morrison Amelia J? June 39 59 Magrove Dearder Doris? See D 39 ? D39 Wakeley Thomas E? See J'40 Truman Woods Jean? See D40 Coulson Marina G? See S41 Seddon Sharp Moyeen? Dec 41 Warner McGovern Edward? See D42 Robinson Evans Alice? Abrams Shiela R 2a See J. J43 Meakins Meakin Dorothy E? Alfred W? D43 Lemmon Lewis Gordon V? See D 43 71 Durrant Spencer Lawrence?
Mch 44 Hovvels Maureen A? See J'44 Powell Davies Stanley? Hansen John? See J'44 Timms Longhurst Walter? See J'44 8 Ward Smith Doreen? See S44 Fry Stanwick Keith? See S44 Sales. See D'44 Rimmer Oxley Jean?
D44 Samson Hugh B? See D'44 20 Smith. J45 Twentyman Burr David F? See J45 Crem[ei]n Clayton David? See J'45 Burns Golling William? J45 R[ua]ff Hastings Patick H? See J45 Demain Roberts Patricia? See J45 Stanley Stokes John? See J'45 Macauley. See S'45 Ellis Johnson Mary? See S'45 Lane Quick Michael? Blunn Shelaron? See D 45 Rockett Boak Ann? See D'45 Klieve Bounds Annette? D45 20 Butterfield Cockerill Graham? Their story landed in real time before the bill received final approval. This is exactly what business journalists should be doing holding politicians accountable. Through dogged reporting and public record requests, Puget Sound Business Journal not only revealed the payments but its reporting led to the money being returned to taxpayers.
The Puget Sound Business Journal resisted the urge to couch its series of breaking stories as gotcha journalism and was careful to present the improvements that the CEO had made. One column looked at the positive impact of diversity on business and process outcomes. This column broadened the argument in many ways, including impacts on shareholders. Although it falls outside the usual commentary realm, we liked the visual aspects included along with the good writing. It also includes what should be done in the future to make companies like Equifax more responsive to consumers.
After corporate executives started arguing against it, the bill failed. He focuses on issues of interest to his readership that are unlikely to be covered elsewhere, and he offers solutions. She marshals ample evidence, connecting disparate and fast-moving events into a coherent picture, which her engaging prose makes accessible to a broad readership. The LA Times narrative stood out because the reporters were truly in the field for this piece, sharing details of the immigrant experience, from wages to housing.
It was thoughtful and extraordinarily descriptive in reporting on a topic widely talked about, but perhaps less understood. We all felt this piece was a good read that made us smarter. Beyond the immigrants at the center of the piece, it captured the broader context of the communities where they work, and the labor market dynamics that supply their jobs. But it went far beyond policy analysis, delving deeply into the lives of people in Eagle Grove, Iowa.
The piece laid out clearly and persuasively why rural communities have good cause for concern. It used data effectively to argue its point, and spotlighted creative approaches to address the problem.
North Carolina Digital Collections
Deep reporting and excellent writing made this package extremely accessible given the jargon-heavy topic. Charts and interactive graphics spelled it out even more simply. The reporting has actually had an impact, given that authorities are reacting. It makes a compelling case that citizens should be worried about changing climate policies in the Trump administration.
A growing stream of oil is pumping through aging pipes along and under the Great Lakes. The pipeline company, Enbridge Inc. Through clear and sophisticated writing, reporter Egan helps readers understand the possible consequences of allowing Enbridge to move forward. By collaborating with a university research tank to sort through available data, the reporter was able to provide specific examples that spelled out risks to companies and taxpayers.
The story provides history and context. It supplements text with excellent graphics to help readers grasp the significance of a previously obscure topic. In short, the combination of clear writing, lavish details and demonstrable impact made this story stand out. In addition to routinely injuring and even killing people, Reuters showed through document reviews, interviews and number- and data-crunching the cost to police departments and city governments of using the electroshock devices.
Companies that have a history of failing to comply with federal workplace safety standards are hiring immigrants to work long hours in the most dangerous jobs; when workers fight for better pay and working conditions, the companies repeatedly use their immigration status against them to quash dissent and avoid paying medical bills. This is an outstanding grouping of stories that are deeply reported and well-written stories. Chabeli Herrera explores income inequality and sky-high housing costs through the commute of a Fontainebleau housekeeper.
The smooth, graceful writing benefits from its relative brevity. Graphics and a compelling video enhance the story. Metro reporting at its best. An example of painstaking reporting, careful writing and patient editing. The seminars, hosted by an industry-backed risk analyst, are an obvious effort to make courts more skeptical of the scientific evidence underpinning regulations.
One story broke news on how the scientists whose study was used by George W. An important story told with exceptionally compelling writing. They can really make your day a little better. The same things could be said about the best feature stories.
- locate a skip skiptrace a person?
- daniel mabry evans divorce maryland?
- track someones car without their knowledge in indiana;
- adult friend finder milbank south dakota.
- 2015 Distinguished Achievement Award Reception honoring Michael R. Bloomberg Photos;
This history of the ubiquitous pink doughnut box is the epitome of the business feature. While explaining one of the curiosities of everyday life, it delights us with insights into entrepreneurship, economics, immigrant culture, and consumer psychology. The question of what happens to a company town when the company leaves is an important one; this story explores the aftermath from when an entire country is overly dependent on one business.
The story was accompanied by beautiful photographs, and a well-presented online package. The lobster industry, it turns out, is particularly susceptible to opioid addiction. Seamans, Kevin Hayes and Geoff Hansen This series represents strong coverage of a business, political and cultural topic of great interest to all of us. With solid interviews, excellent pictures and clear prose, the series showed great range.
The interactive map and charts stood out as unique elements to tell the story. Honorable mention: Inc. This story is an unvarnished look at an effective, no-B. Maria Aspan and Danielle Sacks cracked the code for writing about women executives in an era of MeToo. The story strikes the right chord between recognizing a true pioneer in bringing gender equality to the Silicon Valley and providing a balanced picture of a year-old technology company CEO who has succeeded against long odds.
Winner: The Real Deal The Real Deal was full of news and we really liked some of the how-things-really-work type reporting. It set a high standard for what is expected. Winner: The New York Times This entry included five major reports, all of which illuminated, and some of which triggered, major business or economic developments of Jodi Kantor and Meghan Twohey exposed sexual harassment across three decades by Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein aimed at women over whom he could wield serious career power.
Weinstein apologized while denying some allegations , promised to do better, but was soon ousted from the company bearing his name. Emily Steel and Michael S. These stories played a leading role in spurring a wave of coverage of misbehavior by prominent men in multiple industries and significantly transformed the power dynamic in the executive suite. Winner: Milwaukee Journal Sentinel An outstanding range of work across news, investigations and explanatory journalism. This was a unanimous winner from a deep field with many competitive candidates.
All of the pieces in the entry were strong, and presentation took advantage of smart multimedia as well as print. The investigation about rapes in Mexico was particularly compelling. Honorable mention: Houston Chronicle Impressive work under highly competitive conditions on the flood stories, including an insightful and original piece about floating-roof oil tanks. The entry also showed breadth outside of that major story, with excellent examples of explanatory journalism as well as high-quality visuals and graphics.
Winner: STAT: Reporting from the frontiers of health and medicine STAT impressed us with the breadth and quality of coverage, a powerful marriage of deep reporting with lively, engaging writing. Its breaking news entry, written after another in a long line of highly-anticipated Alzheimers drugs came up short in late-stage testing, went well beyond the basics, succinctly putting the development into the wider context so valuable to readers. The series used great reporting through data analysis and exact sourcing to give voice to an economy that is often invisible and thereby neglected by the country and the media.
The writing was outstanding and delivered a compelling narrative that was hard to stop reading. It exposed the public hazard of barrel refurbishment plans and made a difference. The story neatly wove a novel legal strategy in with the larger fight being waged against climate groups in a way that set the table for the wars to come in this arena.
As judges, we found the meticulousness and depth of reporting, the detail in the anecdotes and the sheer number of documents involved impressive. A seamless presentation through words, graphics and images gripped each of us to make this stunning series the clear winner. Now we have two huge problems to solve. It includes reporting on how a scientific report was tweaked to justify a provision of the Energy Policy Act that bars the Environmental Protection Agency from safeguarding drinking water that may be contaminated by fracking, and how coal mining depleted aquifers.
It also reports on how people responsible for the climate misinformation machine now have a seat at the table of President Donald Trump. Those in financial distress die at higher rates. Doctors are not communicating with patients about how long they have to live, causing some to choose aggressive therapy that can cause pointless suffering.
The stories are compelling and well-sourced and -written. Jeffrey Smith and Chris Zubak-Skees This report illuminates rarely-reported safety weaknesses at corporate contractor run U. Penalties imposed by the government were small compared to the vast amounts they get in contracts. It is a sleek integration of reporting, data and reader tips, which both helps the audience and encourages them to use the interactive tools.
We loved the animated gif too! This was a new experience for all of us. It was also easy to interpret the data in the story and consume it. The series covers a lot of ground in explaining this rehabilitative metamorphosis to a business readership that no doubt had long written off the area. We loved the contrasts between showing how far Estonia has come from Soviet-era backwater with magnificent medieval architecture to rocketing straight into the future with specific, solid examples.
Well-written with every sentence used economically to tell us relevant and interesting information. There are some gems: The PM filing his taxes on his iPad from an airport. All three stories submitted involved rigorous reporting and uncovered incidents and settlements that were previously undisclosed.
Although many victims were unwilling, the newspaper managed to get a number of women to tell their stories. The answer, naturally, is complex, but the LA Times did a masterful job of explaining the reasons and what could or should be done about them. The writing, data, photos and engaging graphics worked together to create an easy-to-follow package relevant to consumers, government and corporations. In a field of outstanding entries, this was a smart piece that did an exceptional job of telling a multilayered story while keeping it interesting.
Excellent analysis, clearly presented. The project got immediate results, including investigations by the state Department of Health and U. A very strong entry. Some workers were fired when they reported skin damage and were denied workers compensation benefits by the company. Excellent use of Iowa OSHA documents, unemployment appeals hearing testimony, photos and on-the-record and anonymous interviews with former workers. The story is well-researched and presented fairly.
Interactive charts clearly showed how widespread advance notice of economic data allowed those in the know to trade on the information. The story had all the right elements and was accompanied by interesting graphics. A very enjoyable read. Patterns begin to emerge: Ratner, through his lawyer, claiming not to recall an incident; Ratner switching seats on an airplane to sit next to a strange woman and then showing nude photos of his girlfriend.
The reporting is methodical and the writing compelling. The anger and frustration of the many direct, named sources is palpable. In most cases, the reporters verified accounts with multiple sources. The series does not shy away from the uncomfortable reality that in many cases, the victims maintained their relationships with Ratner and Simmons and in some cases sought professional gain from them. Each report delivered not only key facts and figures, but also compelling anecdotes of the people affected by them. A report on the comic-book industry was a highlight because of its creative presentation, worthy of the topic.
Need a Checking Account? The piece stands out for its excellent use of data and public records, and for personal stories that bring to life the financial concerns of students, parents and consumer advocates. His prompt take on these shifting policies, and his smart and readable approaches, helps readers make sense of immensely complex topics so they can protect their pocketbooks. This piece was packed with solid tips on ways adult children can move into sensitive caregiving modes by advising aging parents on topics ranging from keeping up with the bills and estate planning to constantly being on alert for fraudulent schemes.
This package of articles offered good suggestions about where families can turn for reliable advice in such situations. The judges were impressed that it was one reporter doing all the work. Prashant Gopal wove together detailed and compelling individual stories to construct a big and important story, one that will continue into the future. Scott Mahaskey A beautifully written and deeply reported story on how Hurricane Maria exposed the open secret of tens of thousands of squatters living illegally in Puerto Rico.
The terrific photographs bring the story to life. A series of engaging videos that included first-person accounts helped to unravel the causes and impact of the most recent wave of foreclosures spurred in part by the recovery in home prices. The numbers alone are striking — from rising rents to sheer volume of office space — but we found the story that followed one home through the selling process particularly effective in illustrating the speed and craziness of the Seattle housing market.
For each, Stiles consistently brought excellent reporting and writing to bear, resulting in stories that were in-depth, nuanced and compulsively readable. His work stood out in a competitive environment for real-estate submissions. Martin did a terrific job of detailing the scope of the issue, talking to affected veterans, real estate brokers and lenders about what was going on and why.
Martin did this well before more national media became interested in similar cases later in This entry is topped off with an innovative interactive tracing the slow death of an American mall by tracking tenant life cycles dating to Strong details and storytelling transformed a local story into a bigger business saga. Disgruntled franchisees formed an association and used details from the article in their complaint to the company. Honorable mention: BusinessInsider. The package provided three angles to the crisis: including engaging pieces on retail job loss, the decline of Sears and the impact of store closings on bond holders.
Lieber provides insight into the strategic decisions the company has made as it struggles to fend off competitors including mighty Amazon. Her reporting about a fledgling restaurant chain with a unique business model is comprehensive and rich with voices.
It was written and edited at a high level, making it an enjoyable read on a fairly wonky subject. We also liked the kicker at the end of the main story about bots. The sidebar on the video-game industry was particularly engaging, and a smart story to do to draw in a younger demographic of readers. Altogether, the trio of stories gave a good degree view of an issue certain to become more pressing in the economy.
It took us inside a single, massive company to examine an interesting change and grappled with an existential crisis many businesses are facing: skills mismatch in an era of technological progress. The outcome is a story that is well-developed and resonant. Readers get to watch up close as truckers exploit a driver shortage and employers despair over the opioid crisis. A scoop about a Walmart floor scrubber shows how automation is creeping into American workplaces. The stories make abstract issues concrete, bolstering the musing of experts with compelling, real-world examples.
We especially liked a piece that profiled a family of immigrant hotel entrepreneurs, telling the story of how they grew a small business into a much bigger one and the creative and thoughtful ways they reacted to the devastation of Hurricane Harvey. Her two other articles described a unique solution to the problem of the fading family farm and the surprising source of all those cardboard eclipse glasses last year. It recounts the experience of one family and then uses data analysis to illustrate the magnitude of the problem. Bravo on the map. The complex process of tax liens and foreclosure is laid out in an understandable fashion that makes readers want to stay with the story until the end.
Many sources are featured, including individuals who are going through the worst time of their lives and are therefore reluctant to speak publicly. This is an example of strong community reporting that can lead to change. Reporter Danielle Chemtob took an in-depth look at the high amount of debt taken on by students at historic black colleges and universities.
Though the story included a lot of hard data on rising tuition costs and flat wages, she kept it interesting and personal by speaking to students and school leaders.
source site Reporters Emily Mahoney and Agnel Philip did an incredible amount of digging for this report. An added bonus: The video of the year-old man, who could lose everything as a result of this personal property seizure program, provided a very personal element to this in-depth investigation. The engaging article smartly wove in graphics and photos and mixed the macro and micro for a fascinating business story. In-depth reporting, quality writing and compelling multimedia made this series the clear winner. The judges also commend a clever interactive graphic that describes the volatility and price declines of much-publicized tech stock offerings.
This trio of stories takes an inventive, investigative look at the underside of social-media giant Facebook and its not-so-politically correct ways, highlighting how hard it is to make it accountable. The topic has huge potential implications for privacy, technology and the consolidation of power. The story draws its force from crisp writing, good graphics and, above all, impressively thorough reporting. It was well-written, clearly organized and comprehensively reported, with informative graphics. The submitted pieces covered three of the most important players — Tesla, Google and Uber — and raised important concerns about safety, tensions with Detroit and theft of intellectual property.
The stories showed impressive sourcing and research and used storytelling elements to bring the stories to life. Quartz was effective in highlighting the human element of drivers caught in the rent-to-own trap, helping readers make a more-personal connection. The follow-up with drivers afterward also was a nice touch. The stories broke new ground in nearly every area of controversy at the company — delivering investigative scoops that punched well above its weight.
Good solid story and notable that the company kept trying to deny what was happening, requiring the reporter to prove it through dogged reporting involving documents and persuading the employees to go on record. The look of the video itself was clean and straight forward, but it clearly took deep reporting, meaningful resources and time to craft it.
The aerial footage! Looks like they used drones to good effect. Impressive production quality and it conveys relevant info. Excellent work. Pell and Charles Levinson. Hall, Gabriellle Paluch and Peter Stone. Seamans, Kevin Hayes and Geoff Hansen. Jeffrey Smith and Chris Zubak-Skees. Linder and Ann Dwyer. Scott Mahaskey. At a tactical level, Shane said, reclaiming your audience means first-party data which includes: who they are; where they work; what their role is; how much money they make; where they live; and what they are interested in. And that means we have to build experiences that are good enough and special enough to motivate people to give us that information.
At The Dallas Morning News , collecting data, such as where their online traffic comes from, helps them decide what content to focus on. Going short just for the sake of short is no good. How big is the audience and does their size and level of engagement match your goals? Does the reporting match your newsroom? Al Lewis, business editor at Houston Chronicle, said his biggest takeaway from the conference session is that resorting to clickbait is a losing strategy.
There are a total of 27 finalists in nine categories this year, selected from well over applicants. Categories include investigative, commentary, investing and personal finance, features, multimedia, beat reporting, package and profile. Business journalists interested in attending can register at sabew. We do that by hosting educational events with company chief executives, leading business journalists and well-known politicians, among others. We also offer teletraining to members to help improve their skills, and hold networking events where business journalists can make new connections, as well as catch up with colleagues and friends.
The package is meaty, timely, and does a lot of work on an important subject. An excellent in-depth look at how Airbnb can sweep through neighborhoods and change the places where we live. Well done in demonstrating real-world impact. Civil Beat made a compelling case that state efforts to post beach warnings and educate travelers were not sufficient to prevent tourists in the last four years from drowning in waters that natives understand are dangerous. The stories identified loopholes in state regulations that allow tour operators to hire incompetent workers.
They raised a family, served those in need and traveled when they could. They died together, too. Overall, excellent reporting, writing and photography throughout. This offered new insights into the scale and scope of the problem and turned the story into a human-interest piece.
No one can remain stoic when listening to the interview of the young woman so stressed she describes throwing up under her desk. The conversational nature of the work illustrates how tone can be used to lighten up the discussion of daunting subjects. One of the most shocking business stories of the year was the revelation that Volkswagen tampered with the emission systems of 11 million cars in order to deceive air-quality regulators. Most major publications covered the basics of the reputation-shattering scandal. Why would anyone sign a lease like that?
Because the terms purportedly make it easier for the drivers to walk away. Whether by luck or foresight, Providence Business News got in front of an issue that is now in the headlines. Its coverage showed the obstacles in replacing a crumbling and dangerous bridge, by going beyond dollars and cents to examine the impact on people living in its shadow.
Special kudos for the visuals, particularly the photos of the deteriorating concrete. Bureau and the Miami Herald. Exceptional journalism on a topic of international importance — secret, offshore companies. This masterful investigation into a complex global subject shed light on a dark and arcane corner of international finance, explaining why it matters. Terrific reporting on what will surely be taught in journalism schools for generations to come. This package of stories put flesh and blood on one of the biggest business stories of the year. This CNN reporter stuck with it, exposing one of the largest household banking names and the corruption it tried to hide.
CNNMoney is to be applauded for its doggedness in running this one to ground. But this package sheds a light on the institutional forces working against federal investigators who sided with a JPMorgan Chase whistleblower: They got fired themselves. The details on the firing of OSHA investigators are backed up with on-the-record takes.
Estate records citing this source
The story presses on whistleblower protection or lack thereof with good writing, excellent reporting and nice national and political context. This package on the Wells Fargo crisis was revealing, deeply sourced, and authoritatively and skillfully written. Colorful anecdotes kept it fresh — such as former CEO who dressed up in a Yankees uniform at a sales event. This detailed, comprehensive reporting effort reveals not only how Yahoo came to secretly install special software on its servers, but also how that was received internally and its broader ramifications.
The story was widely followed and, ultimately, had a significant impact on Yahoo, contributing to a series of factors that forced it to reduce its sale price. In this compelling story, Reel reveals that Baltimore residents had been under secret aerial surveillance. The program, run by a company which refined its technology in war-torn Iraq, avoided scrutiny because it was funded by a private donor, whose identity was also unmasked by Reel. In its wake, officials in 11 cities launched legislative efforts to bring open debate to the use of police surveillance. The Charlotte Observer pushed out the news on Twitter and embarked on an ambitious package of stories.
The result was a breaking-news package that was smartly written, balanced and forward-looking, giving readers the context they needed to understand potential economic and political ramifications. Louis, and the Post-Dispatch responded with deep and thorough coverage of the pending deal.
The coverage was deeply analytical and forward-looking. This package stands out for a successful blend of breaking news on the advance of Iraqi forces against the Islamic State with the human side of the story painted in memorable images such as the kids growing up covered in soot.
Excellent sourcing combined with strong storytelling and concise writing left a lasting impression on the judges. In many instances, this small organization did a better job than its larger counterparts in its reporting on this major economic and political story. The coverage advanced the story of how billionaire Donald Trump got a tax break intended for the middle class — and resulted in a piece that stands out for its sharp but fair writing, and its engaged and approachable storytelling.
It shows how business journalists can play an essential watchdog function to oversee powerful business leaders. You Should, Too. This was a unique form of reporting that required skill and courage to continue to report on an especially litigious business leader. In summary: Exceptional work that was authoritative, deeply reported and cleanly written. Coy deserves to be honored for three substantive and compelling columns on divergent subjects, showing his broad mastery of an impressively wide range of subject matter.
His column on trade provided an impressive overview of the debate and poked holes in long-held beliefs. His column on blockchain technology showed how it could be a significant development in management theory. In summary: Coy has a real gift for explaining complex topics, brilliantly citing historical events to give his writing maximum impact. Thompson has knack for taking broad economic, political and social trends and turning them into incisive commentary about the state of the nation. Instead, he offers a far more nuanced, in-depth assessment.
Through her thoughtful lens, the Sarasota area becomes a microcosm of the challenges that online shopping presents to developers and brick-and-mortar retailers across the U. Menderski puts us on the ground floor of this painful, broad economic shift. In a clear, caring, and surprisingly poetic way, Menderski has produced an important and purposeful body of work.
During a surprising and often chaotic presidential election, The Wall Street Journal helped explain the underlying economic reasons for what was playing out in politics. Using data, graphics, economic analysis, and deep reporting, the WSJ showed the links between economic realities and voter frustrations. The reporting walked readers through the economic promises — and showed how they turned out to be so wrong for so many Americans. This is first-rate economics reporting. The series deploys data, graphics, photography, and design very effectively — and sustains that deployment over the course of three deeply reported pieces.
The theme is also surprising: Far from being a neglected place without hope and riven by opioids, rural America can be the place with the greatest prospect of social mobility. And surprise is what news is all about. PolitiFact presented solid, timely analysis of economic rhetoric during a presidential campaign in which fact and fiction were hard to distinguish. Even the writing was a visual feast. The result is a multimedia tour-de-force that is not only outstanding journalism, it is beautiful.
This piece explores the unraveling of an industry in the light of rock-bottom oil prices, with amazing breadth and depth. Hiller shows the humbling of companies and countries that are rethinking their oil strategies. It was the clear front-runner in a category with some very strong entries. These tenacious reporters are to be credited for turning a swirl of conflicting facts in a war zone into well-sourced, actionable reports. Displaying an impressive grasp of industry and politics, the writers showed how developments in the energy sector would affect the daily lives of those in the region as well as the war against Islamic State.
The use of a map helps to clarify the perilous situation for readers. This is an outstanding example of explanatory journalism. The AP team explored the vast economic divides that fractured the country and ultimately transformed the presidential election. Divided America offers context beyond what is typically reported and sheds light on a phenomenon that helps explain the unexpected campaign success of both Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders. It is the epitome of explanatory journalism — revealing the story behind the story, and ultimately detailing that even the people who live next door can live in different worlds.
This extraordinary work details the business side of Donald Trump. Also of note is the detailing of how Trump University sank itself when the project decided to ramp up the profits at the expense of learning. Banton, Allison E.
Marcus Lemonis profiles everyday Cubans who are the frontier of entrepreneurism in the new Cuba. Woven throughout is the story of siblings who, thanks to the new law, have opened a bakery. An outstanding example of two media outlets with different audiences collaborating successfully to explain the outrageous practice of creating or exaggerating medical conditions to sell more drugs.
Extremely well researched down to the amazing detail that one company admitted in a slide presentation that it created a disease from thin air. The use of graphics and sidebars helped illustrate the tale. What is it about aging athletes and business? With exhaustive research, the paper found the answer and walked readers through the whole sorry scandal. A true explanatory gem. It showed how a strong and clear story idea coupled with dogged investigation could produce an outstanding public service story.
Attempting to answer one of the most vexing questions of the Donald Trump economic era: Why has support for free trade collapsed? The Quartz piece shows that while sidebars, multimedia and other story elements can help a story, if the narrative is strong enough and incredibly well written, it can hold its own. The story reached back to the origins of free trade dogma with British political economist David Ricardo and traced how theory lost its way in the real world.
A series of stories educating readers on how little they understand about their own community. Those leases are doomed to expire and revert to Native American control or could fall into the hands of real-estate speculators. The reporter showed enormous enterprise in ferreting out the voluminous public records and other evidence needed to document the story.
And the presentation of the package, customized for the internet, is spectacular, with an interactive map, a video feature, and panoramic photographs. The online presentation uses technology to advance the narrative, rather than just adding graphic elements for their own sake. This is everything explanatory journalism should be. Who knew that every aspect of scaffolds is micromanaged by the city, making them more expensive to take down than to leave standing? Who knew that the carcinogen perchloroethylene, which we all probably thought was banned years ago, is still being used by dry cleaners and devastating the health of workers and nearby residents?
Who knew that the hardest thing about ensuring that a restaurant is kosher is verifying that there are no insects in the fruits and vegetables? New York is the biggest media market in the country, if not the world. Yet the reporter was able to deliver compelling stories about slices of city life that would otherwise have been overlooked. The reporter not only investigates an obscure industry most people have never stopped to give a second thought to — Garlic? Are you kidding?! And this story carries even more weight now that trade policy has become a priority for the federal government.
A tale of corporate irresponsibility with a new twist — Walmart is skimping on security, burdening local police, and putting employees and shoppers in danger. With telltale lack of cooperation from Walmart, the reporters admirably pieced together data for the story using police call logs and other sources and traveled the country to interview victims. Through impressive on-the-ground reporting in the streets and pastures of Cameroon, Scheck tells the important story of how an unregulated opioid is wreaking havoc in the developing world.
We felt that a strong storyline on a complex subject, on-the-ground reporting, and forward-looking elements of this piece stood out. Graphics break down the issues in vivid detail and bring the disparate elements of cultural and business conflicts into a cohesive narrative, giving Bitter Sweets the edge. Explanatory reporting with compelling graphics in this detailed anatomy of a culture clash. The analysis of how quick noodles became a half-billion-dollar debacle for Nestle in India. How do you find oil hiding in plain sight? This piece told the untold story of one of the largest oil and gas finds in decades.
Forward-looking themes and compelling details made this entry stand out. The rich details in this story about an unexplored topic, combined with skillful writing and a solid narrative structure, brought it over the top for us. It was clear that Helm had spent time on the ground at Pharmapacks getting to know how it ran and what its executives are like. He told us how quickly items move in and out of its warehouse, how much revenue it produces, and how it gets featured on Amazon by picking just the right price.
There were also great quotes and information about what products are unexpectedly the biggest sellers. Koyen used shoe-leather reporting to shed light on an industry whose vendors seem to be on every street corner in New York, but whose business model was not widely known. The details and storytelling were excellent. It was also eye-opening for readers unaffected by the issue, because the reporter brought us into the lives of specific parents who are trying to make sense of the system and make sure their children get the best possible care over the long-term.
Great reporting and insights. Financial Planning displayed a commitment to in-depth reporting and dynamic writing that deserves recognition. The publication covered key issues related to the people and companies in its industry and was willing to present uncomfortable truths about them. The stories also showed foresight, especially regarding the potential for changes in rules requiring advisers to act in the best interest of clients. This false claim is at least partially responsible for the surge of addiction, deaths, and overdoses linked to OxyContin and other opioids that is ravaging the United States.
In a category with many strong submissions, the Los Angeles Times stood above the rest and did it the old-fashioned way with well-conceived story lines that it brought home through deep reporting and great storytelling. The Star Tribune delivered stories of both national and local importance and stood above other entries for consistently demonstrating a sustained level of excellence.
Across all these efforts, the Star Tribune consistently delivered quality news coverage that is worthy of the general excellence award. The Journal Sentinel showed exceptional reporting prowess both on a local and national scale. Then they were dumping the run-down properties in bankruptcy proceedings for the city to repossess, allowing the landlords to escape paying accumulated housing fines.
The paper named the landlords, listed the money they owed, and brought the City of Milwaukee to task for turning a blind eye to the situation. You may be more familiar with it as overeating. This story, with outstanding graphics and sidebars, also highlighted the role being played in this costly game by doctors taking drug-company money. The paper also produced solid stories on a local merger and a billionaire who paid no state taxes. The Business Journal, with a lean staff, took on some big issues like income inequality in the city as it expands, while also providing well-researched scoops and analysis for its readers.
In the most comprehensive study of its kind, the Tribune tested pharmacies to see how often stores would dispense dangerous drug combinations without warning patients. This piece had it all: investigative reporting, deep sourcing, solid writing and, significantly, the power to force change. A compelling topic well covered. Nice investigative work and hit the issue of hospital-borne superbugs from three very different angles. The Bee shone a harsh light on a largely unseen trend toward younger, sometimes dangerous, nursing-home residents.
The story zeroed in on an important issue that seemed overlooked in the regular news cycle; the reporters tracked down documents and data to prove out the thesis with hard evidence; they delved deep enough into the subject matter to understand and illuminate the likely causes; and they wove it together with personal narratives to create a compelling and impactful story. Herper introduces us to the God Pill — a treatment from an obscure San Diego pharmaceutical company that seeks to reverse aging. It examines his short-lived foray into poker, detailing how the engineering Ph.
From those first words, Herper draws a reader into a story that centers on a fascinating character and concept, providing rich detail and careful balance throughout. The reader walks away informed and thoroughly entertained. An engaging and groundbreaking series on one of the biggest health issues of our times, the opioid crisis.
From the minutiae of the junk food needed to persuade a doctor to the harrowing tale of a young woman who died taking a legal version of a risky drug, the series combined meticulous reporting with powerful writing. A revealing look at the myriad ways the industry impacts drug regulation. With rigorous reporting, it shows how the industry has devised a backhanded way to influence the Food and Drug Administration, by sponsoring and participating in patient advocacy groups, and how drug regulation is impacted.
What made the entry remarkably innovative was that reporters from Buzzfeed News and BBC developed an algorithm that allowed them to perform in-depth data analysis of betting patterns in tens of thousands of tennis matches. The U. The results were presented in an entertaining package especially for a data-driven project — the analysis was accessible to the general reader, and the story itself had real impact.
Overall, a strong example of public service. Truly remarkable multimedia reporting on a complex problem with global implications, affecting individuals and nations. By introducing the audience to the individuals affected by the historic migration crisis, we feel the emotions of those who have found new homes, those scarred emotionally and physically, while also sharing a sense of loss for those who have died in transit while hoping to find a better life. Excellent reporting from the ground up, including by showing us a few of the personalities involved.
One gets a sense that this breakdown in civil society could happen anywhere. Hot Mess is a deeply researched, highly compelling account of how a mishandled crisis brought down a brand that Nestle started from scratch 30 years ago, and cost the company half a billion dollars. She produced a beautifully written and fascinating business story that provides valuable lessons on crisis management and recovery to other multinationals, especially those operating in developing markets.
A United Nations report has identified it as a serial human-rights violator. Adams interviewed hundreds of people, including several executives, and she dug through numerous internal documents. Ultimately, she brought to light what appears to be a dark money-making practice. In the aftermath, Iowa Sen. Business-impact aside, Adams put the patients affected at the forefront of her investigation, sharing personal accounts with care and attention to detail.
An incredibly compelling read. The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists produced an impressive collaborative effort to expose a network of law firms and partners actively working to hide billions of dollars in wealth from tax authorities. Their work spawned dozens of investigations and reflected an amazing amount of spadework to uncover hidden connections between professional firms and their wealthy clients. The Panama Papers provided significant fuel to the populist revolt against moneyed elites worldwide.
Strong, voluminous and detailed reporting that exposed landlords with a series of code violations — a story with real, consequential impact on the lives of the most vulnerable. A memorable accomplishment by dogged, skilled reporters. This ambitious and deeply sourced project by the Houston Chronicle reveals in stunning detail the common occurrence in and around Houston of chemical hazards next to businesses, homes and schools. The reporters had to overcome government intransigence in releasing records — hiding behind fear of terrorism — but eventually were able to document a failure of government to protect the public from potential accidents.
It is important work, told in an eight-part series. The story — which involved conducting interviews through translators and obtaining records through state and federal Freedom of Information Act requests — gave voice to the countless foreign workers looking for a better life in America, only to be dashed by apparent injustice. The package was beautifully and hauntingly displayed, and the visuals and reporting urged readers to pay attention to this important topic. The evidence of willful neglect at top levels makes it even worse.
A well-done and a convincing project on the role of algorithms in our lives. The extensive reporting and insightful data analysis uncovered the housing ad problems at Facebook, prompting changes that got a lot of attention. Enterprising reporting that lead to real change. The Atlantic did an excellent job of explaining broader management and corporate challenges in a way that was accessible both to newcomers to the topic and experienced managers.
The managers among the judges found themselves gaining insights that helped them in their roles. A great package for those making career decisions, it had substance and presentation, and a highlight was the before-and-after case studies. Plus, the original findings from a study could be helpful to people at most any stage of their career or considering switching fields or jobs. A reminder that first impressions can be professionally defining. A unique package of stories helpful to many readers.
It offered an inclusive perspective on career moves and hiring decisions for LGBTQ individuals and others. Authors Blas and Hoffman spent months poring over documents about this largely secretive company and used their reporting to spin a fascinating tale. The saga — and it can only be called a saga — of media mogul Sumner Redstone and his personal and professional legacy is powerfully engrossing, instructive and, at times, troubling.
The Wall Street Journal chronicled this drama of high-stakes shifting loyalties not with breathless voyeurism but with deep reporting and trenchant analysis. This gripping and clear-eyed account of a complicated corporate saga — and a generational family drama — combines sweeping big-picture perspective with detailed reporting. A very enjoyable and informative read, and one that manages to stand out on a topic that has received extensive coverage.
Bernard and Lieber did a masterful job of weaving together evidence, personal stories and advice — while translating mountains of jargon into plain English — to uncover a personal finance disgrace: the often-awful investments that teachers and employees of religious and other non-profit entities who advance the public good are forced to make through their b plans. They showed how federal disclosure rules for these accounts are much worse than for k plans, that fees are often outrageously high, and that employees can get socked with ridiculously high charges if they take their money out of some of these accounts early because they are in annuities from insurers.
Ask the Bills column offers practical advice in a sympathetic tone, answering real questions for real people. The reporters present practical methods for dealing with such problems within the U. A strong report on the specific financial problems facing women, relying on strong data and interviews with experts and individuals. Well-written, reported and presented.
The New York Times work stands out because it shines a light on new kinds of questionable practices that had previously drawn little attention. A database of tax-subsidized buildings in New York and other graphical and video elements made the story stand out as an exceptional public service. A deeply reported series that revealed in startling detail how a number of landlords in Milwaukee argued they lacked the money to pay fines and tax penalties, while collecting rents, neglecting building repairs, and paying cash for more properties at foreclosure auctions.
This entry was a standout, taking a deep dive into a complex topic about leased land, with engaging writing, clear subsections, and quotes from a wide variety of relevant sources. We were particularly taken with the visual aids, photos, and interactive map. We found the points of view of the many stakeholders members of the tribe, homeowners, land owners, business owners were presented objectively.
One of our judges said this entry does exactly what you want a small publication to do — take something local and tie it to a larger national or global trend. We noted the engaging writing style, and good visuals and reporting. One judge noted the Yesler Terrace piece tackled an important topic, the tension that arises when developers move in on low-income housing, by putting human faces on the issue. An impressive series of stories that exposed Amazon. The use of complex data to tell an important story is impressive, and the presentation, with detailed but easy-to-understand graphics, is impeccable.
The end result was a compelling report that had almost instantaneous impact. Senators immediately called for change, and Amazon quickly expanded its same-day delivery services. Sharp and elegantly written portraits of J. And, through David Simon, we get a proper education in the state of the American mall in a couple thousand words.
It was a good piece, from the standpoint of both craft and presentation. Demonstrating painstaking commitment to a troubling story, the Indianapolis Business Journal highlighted the connection between new rules for the fast-growing vaping industry in Indiana and one particular security company that benefited from them. Over time, this reporting provided readers with a comprehensive account of how government rule-making benefited one small business at the expense of several.
It was a model for how steady, tough-minded coverage pays off. The story does a good job of showing how the subject portrayed himself as an expert while having little relevant industry experience. All in all, a nice job of getting the story behind the story. A hard news story that breaks new ground, which is a nice achievement for an intern on the bankruptcy beat. Student loan debt is of huge interest right now, so this story is one that could have ramifications. Nicely done.
This examination of payday loans was through, including in-depth financial details from a borrower the audio was an added bonus and the differing perspectives of financial regulators, advocates, and payday-loan executives. Excellent use of statistics. This high-impact project was well-organized and clearly written. This fascinating look at the potential impact of a new mass-transit line puts readers in the picture with powerful prose and photography. A wise decision to tell the story in chapters about the groups most affected by the line. Robust reporting and masterful writing.
Every state would benefit from having a business news wire like this one. UNC-Chapel Hill students are filling a real need, particularly in the areas of breaking news and coverage of public companies. A fascinating read, this entry was beautifully written and expertly reported from all angles.
Very thorough reporting on a complex subject affecting all levels of society. This project did an excellent job highlighting the dilemma posed by new technology and the competing interests of privacy versus public safety. It also showed how Facebook is encountering complicated problems as it becomes a social-media behemoth. He interacted with secret groups of gun owners, shedding light on their tactics to constantly stay ahead of the game, and illuminated a key engineer at Facebook involved in the issue.
Hill gets a nod for a delightful tech mystery that she helped track down and fix. New technology coupled with good old-fashioned reporting skills led her to the offender: an internet mapping glitch! An incredibly informative package that shed light on an issue many people may not be aware of. It was well-researched, the real-person accounts were compelling, and the data was enlightening and, at times, shocking. An outstanding piece overall. Weaving in remarkable imagery, poignant characters, and compelling graphics, the video represents the best of digital video.
It is more than informative. Host Ashlee Vance has a light touch as he casts the skeptical eye of a journalist on the tech wonders he finds along the way. The entertaining series is big budget, high quality and showcases how vibrant, entertaining and informative web video can be.
We felt that it was a brilliantly reported and brilliantly shot piece. The reporters and producers then went the extra step to go back to the original source to present their findings and offer them a chance to respond to the allegations. We also appreciated the tone of the piece. This is quality journalism at its best. Bureau and the Miami Herald; Panama Papers.
Honorable Mention: AmericanBanker. Honorable Mention: St. Rugaber and Josh Boak; Divided America.